international reviews
'House of Judas'
Conrad Botes at Fred
By Danielle de Kock 25 March - 30 April.In his most recent exhibition at Fred gallery, London, Conrad Botes continues the trend of biting, religious satire evident in his previous solo exhibitions at Michael Stevenson; ‘Cain and Abel’ (2009) and ‘Satan's Choir at the Gates of Heaven’ (2007). In fact, for the virgin visitor to Fred, eventually finding the minimally signposted gallery on its narrow, cobbled and somewhat industrial East London street may seem like something of a celestial reward. One has not, however, journeyed to enter ‘the gates of heaven’. This, as the title loosely painted on the wall at the entrance to the gallery reminds us, is the ‘House of Judas’.
The first piece we are confronted with, Botes’ sculpture Prophecy (which was included in the exhibition ‘Self/Not Self’ at Brodie/Stevenson in 2009), is certainly closer to a mythical conception of hell than heaven. The sculpture depicts a devilish character – complete with horns and a menacing black moustache – whose pink tongue hangs limply from his mouth to mimic the enamel-white penis hanging from his pants. Etched into the phallic devil’s chest, seemingly by his own hand, is the image of a crucified pig flanked by the words ‘lucky, lucky’. Is this the Judas of the title, ridden with guilt and serving as the scapegoat for the sins of the world?
The main room contains four large paintings on reverse glass and 35 small panels under the title Land of Judas (2010) which take the stylistic form of a comic sequence. These images draw on the same caustic wit and complex allusions to South Africa’s sociopolitical landscape for which Botes has been known since co-founding ‘Bitterkomix’ in the early 1990s with Anton Kannemeyer. The 35 panels in Land of Judas tell an allegorical story of physical, sexual and racial violence that, along with the larger paintings, seems oddly prescient in light of the recent murder of the divisive founder of the AWB, Eugene Terre’Blanche. Politically biting, this exhibition echoes with such complex notions as scapegoat status, the guilt of betrayal, the religious resonance of sin and retribution, and the haunting nature of South Africa’s violent and racially segregated past.
Botes is known for his subversive critique of the Christian Afrikaner Nationalist identity and the patriarchal forms of secular and religious authority that secured the apartheid government. Terre’Blanche can be seen as a physical symbol of such an identity and, in his death, perhaps even the embodiment of cycles of violence that are depicted within Botes’ work. For these cycles affect both victim and aggressor, their respective roles not always so easily disentangled. As Archbishop Desmond Tutu was recently quoted as saying, although it is problematic to render apartheid the constant ‘scapegoat’ for contemporary experience, we seem to forget sometimes the extent of ‘the damage that was caused. To all of us South Africans. The damage to people who implemented such an inhuman policy, as well as the damage done to the victims’.



